Criminal Code (Cap. 9)
Criminal Code (Cap. 9), article 548
548. (1) The necessary experts shall be employed for the
purposes of the inquest, and a procès-verbal thereof shall be drawn
up:
Provided that the magistrate may, where he deems it to be
so expedient, empower the expert s to receive documents and to
examine witnesses on oath and to take down their depositions in
writing and the provisions of article 650(5) and of article 653 (3)
shall, mutatis mutandis , apply:
Provided further, however, that the " in genere " shall be
examined only by persons of the c ompetent profession, whenever it
appears to be so expedien t for reason s of decency:
Provided further that, without prejudice to the provisions of
article 552(2), no expert shall be appointed solely for the pur pose
of examining witnesses on oath and taking down their deposition s
in writing and establishing the relevant facts, where the offen ce to
be investigated is one which carries a maximum term of
imprisonment of se ven years or more.
(1a) † ( a) An expert appointed by th e court shall be a natural
person and not a juridical pers on. Before appointing an expert, the
Magistrate shall ensure that the expert has knowledge of the
*Vide Article 11 of Act VIII of 2025 .
†Vide Article 11 of Act VIII of 2025 .
CRIMINAL CODE [CAP. 9. 355
criminal law of Malta up to the level required for him to fulfi l his
assignment and, in the case where the expert is not a person
officially accredited to act as an expert in the Courts of Malt a in
accordance with the proviso to article 650(2), he shall underta ke a
due diligence process under the supervision of the Magistrate t hat
shall be carried out by the Department of Justice together with the
Court Services Agency and which shall concern th e qualification s
and suitability of the person to perform that function. Followi ng the
due diligence process the decision as to whether the expert sho uld be
appointed shall vest within the discretion of the Magistrate.
(b) The decree appointing the expert shall explain the
assignment given to the expert and shall also make it clear tha t the
role of the expert is limited to the determination of matters o f fact
relevant to the constitutive elements of the offence only, with out
expressing an opinion with regard to the commission or otherwis e
of the offence. The same decree may include other conditions of
appointment as the Magistra te considers appropriate.
(2) Experts employed in the inque st for the purpose of collectin g
and examining any dactyloscopic data and samples for analysing
human DNA, shall within twenty-four hours of analysing the
dactlyoscopic data or profile, transmit to the Executive Police copies
of the dactyloscopic data and DNA profiles together with any ot her
information related to the dac tyloscopic data and DNA profile, as well
as any other information that the Executive Police may request from
the expert.
For the purpose of this article:
"dactyloscopic data" means fi ngerprint images, images of
fingerprint latents, palm prints, palm print latents, writers p alm
prints and writers palm print latents; and
"DNA profile" means a letter or number code which represents a
set of identification characteristics of the non-coding part of an
analysed human DNA sample, that is the particular molecular
structure at the vario us DNA locations (loci).
(3)* (a) Experts shall be paid fees which are as much as possible
those normally applicable to payments made to professionals for
comparable work in Malta.
(b) The fees referred to in paragraph (a) shall be taxed by
the Registrar of Crimina l Courts and Tribunals.
(c) Notwithstanding the other provisions of this Code or of
any other law, in the case where before an expert is
appointed or at any stage of the execution of his task there
is an expectation that the payment to be made to such
expert shall exceed the s um of fifty thousand euro
(€50,000), or such other higher sum as the Minister
responsible for justice may, from time to time, by order in
the Gazette establish, the Magistrate shall before making
such appointment or authorising the continuation of the
*Vide Article 11 of Act VIII of 2025 .
356 CAP . 9.] CRIMINAL CODE
task consider whether the appointment should be made or
be continued taking into due consideration the gravity of
the offence investigated, the monetary value which the
offence may involve and the proportionality of the expense
and he shall explain his considerations in a record that
shall be communicated to th e Chief Justice. The Chief
Justice shall authorise or r efuse the appointment or the
continuation of the task after taking cognizance of the said
record.
Signatures to
procès-verbal.
Amended by:
X.1858.1;
XIII.1980.21;
VIII.2025.7.
Text read from the consolidated PDF published by Legislation Malta. Tables, figures and marginal notes may be incomplete or out of place: the official PDF is authoritative. General information, not legal, tax or accounting advice.